If you were a peasant in Uttar Pradesh in 1920, how would you have responded to Gandhiji’s call for Swaraj? Give reasons for your response.
Model Answer & Options
Source: TextbookAs a peasant in Uttar Pradesh in 1920, I would have enthusiastically responded to Gandhiji's call for Swaraj. For me and my community, Swaraj was not an abstract political concept but a tangible hope for liberation from immediate and severe oppression. My reasons would be deeply rooted in my daily struggles. Firstly, we were exploited by talukdars and landlords who demanded exorbitant rents and a variety of other cesses. Swaraj meant an end to this injustice and the hope for land redistribution—"land to the tiller." Secondly, we were subjected to 'begar,' or forced labor, without any payment. Gandhiji's call for self-respect and non-cooperation directly challenged this dehumanizing practice. Therefore, joining the movement, participating in 'nai-dhobi bandhs' (social boycotts of landlords), and believing in the promise of a "Gandhi Raj" would have been a rational and powerful response to a life of hardship, offering a vision of a future with dignity, economic relief, and justice.
Take Topic Quiz
Test your understanding of this topic with instant AI feedback.
Explore the Full Topic
This is just one question from the topic "Nationalism in India".
View All QuestionsRelated Questions
- →
What did Mahatma Gandhi mean when he said satyagraha is active resistance?
- →
Why did various classes and groups of Indians participate in the Civil Disobedience Movement?
- →
Do you agree with Sir Muhammad Iqbal’s idea of communalism? Can you define communalism in a different way?
- →
Explain: Why growth of nationalism in the colonies is linked to an anti-colonial movement.
- →
Explain: How the First World War helped in the growth of the National Movement in India.